Skip to content
Commit 1ace9f00 authored by Douglas Anderson's avatar Douglas Anderson Committed by Martin K. Petersen
Browse files

scsi: dt-bindings: ufs: Fix the compatible string definition



If you look at the bindings for the UFS Host Controller it says:

- compatible: must contain "jedec,ufs-1.1" or "jedec,ufs-2.0", may
              also list one or more of the following:
                 "qcom,msm8994-ufshc"
                 "qcom,msm8996-ufshc"
                 "qcom,ufshc"

My reading of that is that it's fine to just have either of these:
1. "qcom,msm8996-ufshc", "jedec,ufs-2.0"
2. "qcom,ufshc", "jedec,ufs-2.0"

As far as I can tell neither of the above is actually a good idea.

For #1 it turns out that the driver currently only keys off the
compatible string "qcom,ufshc" so it won't actually probe.

For #2 the driver won't probe but it's not a good idea to keep the SoC
name out of the compatible string.

Let's update the compatible string to make it really explicit.  We'll
include a nod to the existing driver and the old binding and say that
we should always include the "qcom,ufshc" string in addition to the
SoC compatible string.

While we're at it we'll also include another example SoC known to have
UFS: sdm845.

Fixes: 47555a5c ("scsi: ufs: make the UFS variant a platform device")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarVivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
parent 6f4e626f
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment