Commit 649839d7 authored by Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi's avatar Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi Committed by Daniel Vetter
Browse files

drm: add lockdep assert to drm_is_current_master_locked



In drm_is_current_master_locked, accessing drm_file.master should be
protected by either drm_file.master_lookup_lock or
drm_device.master_mutex. This was previously awkward to assert with
lockdep.

Following patch ("locking/lockdep: Provide lockdep_assert{,_once}()
helpers"), this assertion is now convenient. So we add in the
assertion and explain this lock design in the kerneldoc.

Signed-off-by: default avatarDesmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarBoqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarWaiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210802105957.77692-3-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com
parent d19c8137
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+3 −3
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -63,9 +63,9 @@

static bool drm_is_current_master_locked(struct drm_file *fpriv)
{
	/* Either drm_device.master_mutex or drm_file.master_lookup_lock
	 * should be held here.
	 */
	lockdep_assert_once(lockdep_is_held(&fpriv->master_lookup_lock) ||
			    lockdep_is_held(&fpriv->minor->dev->master_mutex));

	return fpriv->is_master && drm_lease_owner(fpriv->master) == fpriv->minor->dev->master;
}

+4 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -233,6 +233,10 @@ struct drm_file {
	 * this only matches &drm_device.master if the master is the currently
	 * active one.
	 *
	 * To update @master, both &drm_device.master_mutex and
	 * @master_lookup_lock need to be held, therefore holding either of
	 * them is safe and enough for the read side.
	 *
	 * When dereferencing this pointer, either hold struct
	 * &drm_device.master_mutex for the duration of the pointer's use, or
	 * use drm_file_get_master() if struct &drm_device.master_mutex is not