Commit 755a0c70 authored by jan.koester's avatar jan.koester
Browse files

fxed sched fair build

parent b770d024
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+114 −13
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -3582,39 +3582,140 @@ static inline void
dequeue_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) { }
#endif

static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
static void reweight_eevdf(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
			   unsigned long weight)
{
	unsigned long old_weight = se->load.weight;
	u64 avruntime = avg_vruntime(cfs_rq);
	s64 vlag, vslice;

	/*
	 * VRUNTIME
	 * ========
	 *
	 * COROLLARY #1: The virtual runtime of the entity needs to be
	 * adjusted if re-weight at !0-lag point.
	 *
	 * Proof: For contradiction assume this is not true, so we can
	 * re-weight without changing vruntime at !0-lag point.
	 *
	 *             Weight	VRuntime   Avg-VRuntime
	 *     before    w          v            V
	 *      after    w'         v'           V'
	 *
	 * Since lag needs to be preserved through re-weight:
	 *
	 *	lag = (V - v)*w = (V'- v')*w', where v = v'
	 *	==>	V' = (V - v)*w/w' + v		(1)
	 *
	 * Let W be the total weight of the entities before reweight,
	 * since V' is the new weighted average of entities:
	 *
	 *	V' = (WV + w'v - wv) / (W + w' - w)	(2)
	 *
	 * by using (1) & (2) we obtain:
	 *
	 *	(WV + w'v - wv) / (W + w' - w) = (V - v)*w/w' + v
	 *	==> (WV-Wv+Wv+w'v-wv)/(W+w'-w) = (V - v)*w/w' + v
	 *	==> (WV - Wv)/(W + w' - w) + v = (V - v)*w/w' + v
	 *	==>	(V - v)*W/(W + w' - w) = (V - v)*w/w' (3)
	 *
	 * Since we are doing at !0-lag point which means V != v, we
	 * can simplify (3):
	 *
	 *	==>	W / (W + w' - w) = w / w'
	 *	==>	Ww' = Ww + ww' - ww
	 *	==>	W * (w' - w) = w * (w' - w)
	 *	==>	W = w	(re-weight indicates w' != w)
	 *
	 * So the cfs_rq contains only one entity, hence vruntime of
	 * the entity @v should always equal to the cfs_rq's weighted
	 * average vruntime @V, which means we will always re-weight
	 * at 0-lag point, thus breach assumption. Proof completed.
	 *
	 *
	 * COROLLARY #2: Re-weight does NOT affect weighted average
	 * vruntime of all the entities.
	 *
	 * Proof: According to corollary #1, Eq. (1) should be:
	 *
	 *	(V - v)*w = (V' - v')*w'
	 *	==>    v' = V' - (V - v)*w/w'		(4)
	 *
	 * According to the weighted average formula, we have:
	 *
	 *	V' = (WV - wv + w'v') / (W - w + w')
	 *	   = (WV - wv + w'(V' - (V - v)w/w')) / (W - w + w')
	 *	   = (WV - wv + w'V' - Vw + wv) / (W - w + w')
	 *	   = (WV + w'V' - Vw) / (W - w + w')
	 *
	 *	==>  V'*(W - w + w') = WV + w'V' - Vw
	 *	==>	V' * (W - w) = (W - w) * V	(5)
	 *
	 * If the entity is the only one in the cfs_rq, then reweight
	 * always occurs at 0-lag point, so V won't change. Or else
	 * there are other entities, hence W != w, then Eq. (5) turns
	 * into V' = V. So V won't change in either case, proof done.
	 *
	 *
	 * So according to corollary #1 & #2, the effect of re-weight
	 * on vruntime should be:
	 *
	 *	v' = V' - (V - v) * w / w'		(4)
	 *	   = V  - (V - v) * w / w'
	 *	   = V  - vl * w / w'
	 *	   = V  - vl'
	 */
	if (avruntime != se->vruntime) {
		vlag = (s64)(avruntime - se->vruntime);
		vlag = div_s64(vlag * old_weight, weight);
		se->vruntime = avruntime - vlag;
	}

	/*
 * DEADLINE
	 * ========
	 *
	 * When the weight changes, the virtual time slope changes and
	 * we should adjust the relative virtual deadline accordingly.
	 *
	 *	d' = v' + (d - v)*w/w'
	 *	   = V' - (V - v)*w/w' + (d - v)*w/w'
	 *	   = V  - (V - v)*w/w' + (d - v)*w/w'
	 *	   = V  + (d - V)*w/w'
	 */
	vslice = (s64)(se->deadline - avruntime);
	vslice = div_s64(vslice * old_weight, weight);
	se->deadline = avruntime + vslice;
}

static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
			    unsigned long weight)
{
	bool curr = cfs_rq->curr == se;

	if (se->on_rq) {
		/* commit outstanding execution time */
		if (cfs_rq->curr == se)
		if (curr)
			update_curr(cfs_rq);
		else
			avg_vruntime_sub(cfs_rq, se);
			__dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
		update_load_sub(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight);
	}
	dequeue_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);

	update_load_set(&se->load, weight);

	if (!se->on_rq) {
		/*
		 * Because we keep se->vlag = V - v_i, while: lag_i = w_i*(V - v_i),
		 * we need to scale se->vlag when w_i changes.
		 */
		se->vlag = div_s64(se->vlag * old_weight, weight);
		se->vlag = div_s64(se->vlag * se->load.weight, weight);
	} else {
		s64 deadline = se->deadline - se->vruntime;
		/*
		 * When the weight changes, the virtual time slope changes and
		 * we should adjust the relative virtual deadline accordingly.
		 */
		deadline = div_s64(deadline * old_weight, weight);
		se->deadline = se->vruntime + deadline;
		reweight_eevdf(cfs_rq, se, weight);
	}

	update_load_set(&se->load, weight);

#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
	do {
		u32 divider = get_pelt_divider(&se->avg);

kernel/sched/fair.c.rej

deleted100644 → 0
+0 −158
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
--- kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3626,41 +3626,140 @@ static inline void
 dequeue_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) { }
 #endif
 
+static void reweight_eevdf(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
+			   unsigned long weight)
+{
+	unsigned long old_weight = se->load.weight;
+	u64 avruntime = avg_vruntime(cfs_rq);
+	s64 vlag, vslice;
+
+	/*
+	 * VRUNTIME
+	 * ========
+	 *
+	 * COROLLARY #1: The virtual runtime of the entity needs to be
+	 * adjusted if re-weight at !0-lag point.
+	 *
+	 * Proof: For contradiction assume this is not true, so we can
+	 * re-weight without changing vruntime at !0-lag point.
+	 *
+	 *             Weight	VRuntime   Avg-VRuntime
+	 *     before    w          v            V
+	 *      after    w'         v'           V'
+	 *
+	 * Since lag needs to be preserved through re-weight:
+	 *
+	 *	lag = (V - v)*w = (V'- v')*w', where v = v'
+	 *	==>	V' = (V - v)*w/w' + v		(1)
+	 *
+	 * Let W be the total weight of the entities before reweight,
+	 * since V' is the new weighted average of entities:
+	 *
+	 *	V' = (WV + w'v - wv) / (W + w' - w)	(2)
+	 *
+	 * by using (1) & (2) we obtain:
+	 *
+	 *	(WV + w'v - wv) / (W + w' - w) = (V - v)*w/w' + v
+	 *	==> (WV-Wv+Wv+w'v-wv)/(W+w'-w) = (V - v)*w/w' + v
+	 *	==> (WV - Wv)/(W + w' - w) + v = (V - v)*w/w' + v
+	 *	==>	(V - v)*W/(W + w' - w) = (V - v)*w/w' (3)
+	 *
+	 * Since we are doing at !0-lag point which means V != v, we
+	 * can simplify (3):
+	 *
+	 *	==>	W / (W + w' - w) = w / w'
+	 *	==>	Ww' = Ww + ww' - ww
+	 *	==>	W * (w' - w) = w * (w' - w)
+	 *	==>	W = w	(re-weight indicates w' != w)
+	 *
+	 * So the cfs_rq contains only one entity, hence vruntime of
+	 * the entity @v should always equal to the cfs_rq's weighted
+	 * average vruntime @V, which means we will always re-weight
+	 * at 0-lag point, thus breach assumption. Proof completed.
+	 *
+	 *
+	 * COROLLARY #2: Re-weight does NOT affect weighted average
+	 * vruntime of all the entities.
+	 *
+	 * Proof: According to corollary #1, Eq. (1) should be:
+	 *
+	 *	(V - v)*w = (V' - v')*w'
+	 *	==>    v' = V' - (V - v)*w/w'		(4)
+	 *
+	 * According to the weighted average formula, we have:
+	 *
+	 *	V' = (WV - wv + w'v') / (W - w + w')
+	 *	   = (WV - wv + w'(V' - (V - v)w/w')) / (W - w + w')
+	 *	   = (WV - wv + w'V' - Vw + wv) / (W - w + w')
+	 *	   = (WV + w'V' - Vw) / (W - w + w')
+	 *
+	 *	==>  V'*(W - w + w') = WV + w'V' - Vw
+	 *	==>	V' * (W - w) = (W - w) * V	(5)
+	 *
+	 * If the entity is the only one in the cfs_rq, then reweight
+	 * always occurs at 0-lag point, so V won't change. Or else
+	 * there are other entities, hence W != w, then Eq. (5) turns
+	 * into V' = V. So V won't change in either case, proof done.
+	 *
+	 *
+	 * So according to corollary #1 & #2, the effect of re-weight
+	 * on vruntime should be:
+	 *
+	 *	v' = V' - (V - v) * w / w'		(4)
+	 *	   = V  - (V - v) * w / w'
+	 *	   = V  - vl * w / w'
+	 *	   = V  - vl'
+	 */
+	if (avruntime != se->vruntime) {
+		vlag = (s64)(avruntime - se->vruntime);
+		vlag = div_s64(vlag * old_weight, weight);
+		se->vruntime = avruntime - vlag;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * DEADLINE
+	 * ========
+	 *
+	 * When the weight changes, the virtual time slope changes and
+	 * we should adjust the relative virtual deadline accordingly.
+	 *
+	 *	d' = v' + (d - v)*w/w'
+	 *	   = V' - (V - v)*w/w' + (d - v)*w/w'
+	 *	   = V  - (V - v)*w/w' + (d - v)*w/w'
+	 *	   = V  + (d - V)*w/w'
+	 */
+	vslice = (s64)(se->deadline - avruntime);
+	vslice = div_s64(vslice * old_weight, weight);
+	se->deadline = avruntime + vslice;
+}
+
 static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
 			    unsigned long weight)
 {
-	unsigned long old_weight = se->load.weight;
+	bool curr = cfs_rq->curr == se;
 
 	if (se->on_rq) {
 		/* commit outstanding execution time */
-		if (cfs_rq->curr == se)
+		if (curr)
 			update_curr(cfs_rq);
 		else
-			avg_vruntime_sub(cfs_rq, se);
+			__dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
 		update_load_sub(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight);
 	}
 	dequeue_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
 
-	update_load_set(&se->load, weight);
-
 	if (!se->on_rq) {
 		/*
 		 * Because we keep se->vlag = V - v_i, while: lag_i = w_i*(V - v_i),
 		 * we need to scale se->vlag when w_i changes.
 		 */
-		se->vlag = div_s64(se->vlag * old_weight, weight);
+		se->vlag = div_s64(se->vlag * se->load.weight, weight);
 	} else {
-		s64 deadline = se->deadline - se->vruntime;
-		/*
-		 * When the weight changes, the virtual time slope changes and
-		 * we should adjust the relative virtual deadline accordingly.
-		 */
-		deadline = div_s64(deadline * old_weight, weight);
-		se->deadline = se->vruntime + deadline;
-		if (se != cfs_rq->curr)
-			min_deadline_cb_propagate(&se->run_node, NULL);
+		reweight_eevdf(cfs_rq, se, weight);
 	}
 
+	update_load_set(&se->load, weight);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	do {
 		u32 divider = get_pelt_divider(&se->avg);