Commit d1cfdcad authored by Fabio Aiuto's avatar Fabio Aiuto Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
Browse files

staging: rtl8723bs: unwrap initialization of queues



unwrap initialization of queues to avoid false positive
lockdep warning:

[   27.350258] ============================================
[   27.350267] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[   27.350276] 5.14.0-rc6+ #16 Tainted: G         C OE
[   27.350288] --------------------------------------------
[   27.350295] RTW_CMD_THREAD/679 is trying to acquire lock:
[   27.350306] ffffa846c03290c8 (&(pqueue->lock)){+.-.}-{2:2},
		at: rtw_alloc_network+0x1b/0xa0 [r8723bs]
[   27.350441]
               but task is already holding lock:
[   27.350448] ffffa846c0329118 (&(pqueue->lock)){+.-.}-{2:2},
		at: rtw_update_scanned_network+0x33/0x1d0 [r8723bs]
[   27.350573]
               other info that might help us debug this:
[   27.350581]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[   27.350588]        CPU0
[   27.350594]        ----
[   27.350600]   lock(&(pqueue->lock));
[   27.350614]   lock(&(pqueue->lock));
[   27.350627]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[   27.350634]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

[   27.350641] 2 locks held by RTW_CMD_THREAD/679:
[   27.350652]  #0: ffffa846c0329038 (&pmlmepriv->lock){+...}-{2:2},
	at: rtw_survey_event_callback+0x2d/0xe0 [r8723bs]
[   27.350780]  #1: ffffa846c0329118 (&(pqueue->lock)){+.-.}-{2:2},
	at: rtw_update_scanned_network+0x33/0x1d0 [r8723bs]
[   27.350907]
               stack backtrace:
[   27.350916] CPU: 3 PID: 679 Comm: RTW_CMD_THREAD Tainted: G
		C OE     5.14.0-rc6+ #16
[   27.350933] Hardware name: LENOVO 80NR/Madrid, BIOS DACN25WW
		08/20/2015
[   27.350943] Call Trace:
[   27.350959]  dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f
[   27.350982]  __lock_acquire.cold.79+0x137/0x298
[   27.351012]  lock_acquire+0xb4/0x2c0
[   27.351031]  ? rtw_alloc_network+0x1b/0xa0 [r8723bs]
[   27.351140]  ? rtw_update_scanned_network+0x33/0x1d0 [r8723bs]
[   27.351254]  _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40
[   27.351271]  ? rtw_alloc_network+0x1b/0xa0 [r8723bs]
[   27.351378]  rtw_alloc_network+0x1b/0xa0 [r8723bs]
[   27.351488]  rtw_update_scanned_network+0xa5/0x1d0 [r8723bs]
[   27.351605]  rtw_survey_event_callback+0x54/0xe0 [r8723bs]
[   27.351719]  mlme_evt_hdl+0x4e/0x70 [r8723bs]
[   27.351839]  rtw_cmd_thread+0x16c/0x3d0 [r8723bs]
[   27.351945]  ? rtw_stop_cmd_thread+0x50/0x50 [r8723bs]
[   27.352045]  kthread+0x136/0x160
[   27.352064]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
[   27.352083]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

This happens because the wrapping function _rtw_init_queues()
bring lockdep considering all queues as a single one. But
all queues are different with their own lock.

Applied the following semantic patch:

@@
expression a;
@@

-       _rtw_init_queue(&a);
+       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&a.queue);
+       spin_lock_init(&a.lock);

Reported-by: default avatarHans De Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c2c3a18cc2b883feab74f150ccbaa4f2cc11995c.1630307025.git.fabioaiuto83@gmail.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 8ffd91d9
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+2 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ void init_mlme_ap_info(struct adapter *padapter)
	spin_lock_init(&pmlmepriv->bcn_update_lock);

	/* for ACL */
	_rtw_init_queue(&pacl_list->acl_node_q);
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pacl_list->acl_node_q.queue);
	spin_lock_init(&pacl_list->acl_node_q.lock);

	/* pmlmeext->bstart_bss = false; */

+2 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ int rtw_init_cmd_priv(struct cmd_priv *pcmdpriv)
	init_completion(&pcmdpriv->cmd_queue_comp);
	init_completion(&pcmdpriv->terminate_cmdthread_comp);

	_rtw_init_queue(&(pcmdpriv->cmd_queue));
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(pcmdpriv->cmd_queue).queue);
	spin_lock_init(&(pcmdpriv->cmd_queue).lock);

	/* allocate DMA-able/Non-Page memory for cmd_buf and rsp_buf */

+4 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -27,8 +27,10 @@ int rtw_init_mlme_priv(struct adapter *padapter)
	pmlmepriv->scan_mode = SCAN_ACTIVE;/*  1: active, 0: pasive. Maybe someday we should rename this varable to "active_mode" (Jeff) */

	spin_lock_init(&pmlmepriv->lock);
	_rtw_init_queue(&pmlmepriv->free_bss_pool);
	_rtw_init_queue(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue);
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pmlmepriv->free_bss_pool.queue);
	spin_lock_init(&pmlmepriv->free_bss_pool.lock);
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.queue);
	spin_lock_init(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock);

	set_scanned_network_val(pmlmepriv, 0);

+8 −4
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -25,7 +25,8 @@ void _rtw_init_sta_recv_priv(struct sta_recv_priv *psta_recvpriv)
	/* for (i = 0; i<MAX_RX_NUMBLKS; i++) */
	/* _rtw_init_queue(&psta_recvpriv->blk_strms[i]); */

	_rtw_init_queue(&psta_recvpriv->defrag_q);
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&psta_recvpriv->defrag_q.queue);
	spin_lock_init(&psta_recvpriv->defrag_q.lock);
}

signed int _rtw_init_recv_priv(struct recv_priv *precvpriv, struct adapter *padapter)
@@ -36,9 +37,12 @@ signed int _rtw_init_recv_priv(struct recv_priv *precvpriv, struct adapter *pada

	spin_lock_init(&precvpriv->lock);

	_rtw_init_queue(&precvpriv->free_recv_queue);
	_rtw_init_queue(&precvpriv->recv_pending_queue);
	_rtw_init_queue(&precvpriv->uc_swdec_pending_queue);
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&precvpriv->free_recv_queue.queue);
	spin_lock_init(&precvpriv->free_recv_queue.lock);
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&precvpriv->recv_pending_queue.queue);
	spin_lock_init(&precvpriv->recv_pending_queue.lock);
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&precvpriv->uc_swdec_pending_queue.queue);
	spin_lock_init(&precvpriv->uc_swdec_pending_queue.lock);

	precvpriv->adapter = padapter;

+10 −5
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ void _rtw_init_stainfo(struct sta_info *psta)
	/* INIT_LIST_HEAD(&psta->sleep_list); */
	/* INIT_LIST_HEAD(&psta->wakeup_list); */

	_rtw_init_queue(&psta->sleep_q);
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&psta->sleep_q.queue);
	spin_lock_init(&psta->sleep_q.lock);
	psta->sleepq_len = 0;

	_rtw_init_sta_xmit_priv(&psta->sta_xmitpriv);
@@ -62,14 +63,17 @@ u32 _rtw_init_sta_priv(struct sta_priv *pstapriv)
	pstapriv->pstainfo_buf = pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf + 4 -
		((SIZE_PTR)(pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf) & 3);

	_rtw_init_queue(&pstapriv->free_sta_queue);
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pstapriv->free_sta_queue.queue);
	spin_lock_init(&pstapriv->free_sta_queue.lock);

	spin_lock_init(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock);

	/* _rtw_init_queue(&pstapriv->asoc_q); */
	pstapriv->asoc_sta_count = 0;
	_rtw_init_queue(&pstapriv->sleep_q);
	_rtw_init_queue(&pstapriv->wakeup_q);
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pstapriv->sleep_q.queue);
	spin_lock_init(&pstapriv->sleep_q.lock);
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pstapriv->wakeup_q.queue);
	spin_lock_init(&pstapriv->wakeup_q.lock);

	psta = (struct sta_info *)(pstapriv->pstainfo_buf);

@@ -242,7 +246,8 @@ struct sta_info *rtw_alloc_stainfo(struct sta_priv *pstapriv, u8 *hwaddr)
			/* preorder_ctrl->wsize_b = (NR_RECVBUFF-2); */
			preorder_ctrl->wsize_b = 64;/* 64; */

			_rtw_init_queue(&preorder_ctrl->pending_recvframe_queue);
			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&preorder_ctrl->pending_recvframe_queue.queue);
			spin_lock_init(&preorder_ctrl->pending_recvframe_queue.lock);

			rtw_init_recv_timer(preorder_ctrl);
		}
Loading