Commit edb63a53 authored by Luben Tuikov's avatar Luben Tuikov Committed by Alex Deucher
Browse files

drm/amdgpu: Fix wrap-around bugs in RAS



Fix the size of the EEPROM from 256000 bytes
to 262144 bytes (256 KiB).

Fix a couple or wrap around bugs. If a valid
value/address is 0 <= addr < size, the inverse of
this inequality (barring negative values which
make no sense here) is addr >= size. Fix this in
the RAS code.

Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Andrey Grodzovsky <Andrey.Grodzovsky@amd.com>
Cc: Lijo Lazar <Lijo.Lazar@amd.com>
Cc: Stanley Yang <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>
Cc: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLuben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
Acked-by: default avatarAlexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
parent ccdfbfec
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+10 −10
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -52,9 +52,8 @@
/* Bad GPU tag ‘BADG’ */
#define EEPROM_TABLE_HDR_BAD 0x42414447

/* Assume 2 Mbit size */
#define EEPROM_SIZE_BYTES 256000
#define EEPROM_PAGE__SIZE_BYTES 256
/* Assume 2-Mbit size */
#define EEPROM_SIZE_BYTES       (256 * 1024)
#define EEPROM_HDR_START        0
#define EEPROM_RECORD_START     (EEPROM_HDR_START + EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE)
#define EEPROM_MAX_RECORD_NUM   ((EEPROM_SIZE_BYTES - EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE) / EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE)
@@ -402,9 +401,8 @@ static uint32_t __correct_eeprom_dest_address(uint32_t curr_address)
	uint32_t next_address = curr_address + EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE;

	/* When all EEPROM memory used jump back to 0 address */
	if (next_address > EEPROM_SIZE_BYTES) {
		DRM_INFO("Reached end of EEPROM memory, jumping to 0 "
			 "and overriding old record");
	if (next_address >= EEPROM_SIZE_BYTES) {
		DRM_INFO("Reached end of EEPROM memory, wrap around to 0.");
		return EEPROM_RECORD_START;
	}

@@ -476,7 +474,9 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_process_recods(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
	}

	/* In case of overflow just start from beginning to not lose newest records */
	if (write && (control->next_addr + EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE * num > EEPROM_SIZE_BYTES))
	if (write &&
	    (control->next_addr +
	     EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE * num >= EEPROM_SIZE_BYTES))
		control->next_addr = EEPROM_RECORD_START;

	/*